Skip to content
EconToMarks

Study

Build better answers from real economics

Find an example, see the chain behind it, test the evaluation, and use the evidence where it earns marks.

Example finder

Start with the question you need to answer

1 example in this view

Clear
13 July 2026 · United KingdomReal exampleDeep Dive12-marker15-marker

UK Soft Drinks Industry Levy threshold will fall to 4.5g of added sugar per 100ml

HMRC confirmed that from 1 January 2028 the Soft Drinks Industry Levy threshold will fall from 5g to 4.5g of added sugar per 100ml, while exemptions for milk-based and milk-substitute drinks will be removed. It is a strong market-failure case because the government expects firms to respond by reformulating products, so the intervention changes incentives before many consumers ever pay a higher price.

Chain

Sugar-related health costs and imperfect consumer decisions → levy makes high-sugar formulations more costly → firms reformulate and/or pass on some tax → sugar content or consumption may fall → external costs and welfare loss may fall

Evaluation

The policy may work mainly by changing producer behaviour rather than by raising retail prices: HMRC expects only an additional 4% of soft-drink sales to pay the levy after expected reformulation. The final welfare effect depends on reformulation, demand elasticity, substitution, tax incidence and how accurately the levy reflects the social cost.

Diagram

Demerit-good / negative consumption externality diagram showing MPB above MSB, with the levy used to reduce overconsumption

Practice

Apply the evidence yourself

Use a real example to practise the chain, evaluation and judgement instead of memorising a model essay.

12-marker

Evaluate the effectiveness of indirect taxation in correcting market failure caused by the consumption of demerit goods.

Review the Deep Dive →